Welcome to my LinkedIn archive.
Categories: Dear 1L, Dear 2L, Legal Writing
By Year: 2026, 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021
Follow me on LinkedIn
Search by word to find what I’ve written on the topic of your choosing!
Dear Legal Writer, Be careful using “not” and “because” in the same sentence.
Here’s a classic example:
👿 “She was not promoted because she is female.”
Hmm. Was she promoted?
That’s not clear.
Dear 1L, I hate the saying, “Look left; look right; 3 years from now, only 1 of you will be here
Old law-school deans apparently used to say this to 1Ls on the first day of law school.)
Here’s what I want you to think about today instead:
Dear Legal Writer, “If you can give good directions, you can probably write a good brief.”
—That’s one of Bryan Garner’s famous quotes, and I want you to think about what it means.
I also want you to go back to the pre-iPhone and pre-Mapquest days when Garner said it:
Dear Legal Writer, For the love of God, please stop writing “By and through undersigned counsel.”
Nothing requires it.
Your signature block covers it.
Your hackneyed legalese adds nothing.
STOP!
Dear Legal Writer, Here’s something I use every day to make my writing better—
In fact, it’s my No. 1 tool.
(And it’s not some fancy, new AI program; I’ve been using this same tool for decades.)
6 Markers of Firm Culture to Look for & How to Uncover Them
It’s hard to know a law firm’s true culture before you actually start working there.
But no law student wants to start working somewhere only to find out it’s a mismatch.
You really need to do some detective work first.
I started with 486 connections. Now I have 55,877 followers. It has changed my life. It has been extraordinary.
A big part of my inspiration all along has been Justin Welsh.
He was the first person whose posts I looked forward to every morning on LinkedIn back in 2021.
Dear Legal Writer: A sultry summer day calls for some sentence-slicers.
Try these 6.
Let’s strip some weight from everyone’s load today—
🥵 HEAVY ———> LIGHT 🎈
Dear Legal Writer, I recoil in disgust at “As such.” No one uses it correctly.
Even worse, people think they 𝙙𝙤 know how to use it, so they use it too much, like a crutch. —Let’s learn to tell wrong from right, today, OK?
🔷 THE WRONG WAY
Dear Legal Writer, The No. 1 mistake associates make in their drafts has nothing to do with legal writing.
It also has nothing to do with English:
-grammar
-punctuation
-usage
-syntax
(Although many associates get those wrong, too.)
I awoke to amazing news: 𝟭,𝟱𝟬𝟭 copies sold for *𝗗𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝟭𝗟*!
I owe ALL of my happy news to YOUR consistent support, and I am so, so grateful. 🙏🏻
My dream is to make Dear 1L the book that EVERY law student reads:
Dear Legal Writer: Clarity is more important than brevity, so please stop mindlessly cutting the word “that” to save space.
True, “I think you should go” = “I think 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 you should go,” and each version is correct.
So there, you can cut the “that” to save space—no problem.
Dear Legal Writer, Is it “myriad” or “a myriad of”? I did a deep dive. Here’s my take, and don’t miss the 3 big caveats. ⤵️
🔷 DEFINITION:
The word “myriad” means “a countless number of specified things,” (Oxford English Dictionary), or “an uncountable number.”
I’m celebrating Dear 1L’s birthday today. And while I missed my sales goal by 50 books, I am feeling good:
▪️ I reached 1,450 books for the year—a HUGE jump of 47 copies since 6 days ago, when I posted an offer to send a free book to 3 incoming 1Ls.
At first, I was embarrassed when only two incoming 1Ls took me up on my free book offer.
Dear Legal Writer, “As regards,” “Regarding,” and “In regard to” are the ultimate life-suckers of legal writing. In fact, you can lose the word “regard” altogether.
—> “Regard” creates clauses that are long, clunky, and awkward.
Instead, try using “On” or “As to.”
❌ “Regarding the first claim, plaintiff cites no support.”