Welcome to my LinkedIn archive.
Categories: Dear 1L, Dear 2L, Legal Writing
By Year: 2026, 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021
Follow me on LinkedIn
Search by word to find what I’ve written on the topic of your choosing!
The comma goes INSIDE the quotes, OK?
Dear Legal Writer:
Put a comma or period INSIDE the quotation marks.
Do this regardless of whether that comma or period appeared in the original, quoted material.
Scope: U.S. Legal Writing*
Here are two examples.
Dear Legal Writer, Watch out for 4 mistakes lawyers make with lists.
1️⃣ Mistake No. 1:
The items don’t make sense with the words setting up the list.
🔻 Example: “The applicant must submit a filing fee, a copy of the permit, and fill out a form.”
The culprit is easier to detect if you diagram:
So I got my first 1-star review on Amazon yesterday.
I knew it would happen eventually, but wow, it still sucked.
Last evening, as I played the otherwise terrible day back in my mind, the review was the thing that really stuck in my craw.
Then a real friend came through for me.
And I emphasize “real.”
Legal writing has changed since the 1990s when I started.
🔹 Old, obsolete way:
-Use complex words non-lawyers won’t know.
-Use no charts, timelines, or photographs.
-Add emphasis with boldface and italics.
-Write in Times New Roman font.
-Use acronyms for party names.
-Use footnotes to save space.
-Maximize use of legalese.
I’ve never understood why partners use red ink when marking up junior lawyers’ drafts.
To me, marking edits in red ink is like using ALLCAPS in an email.
Where ALLCAPS signifies shouting, red ink signifies barking.
The result is a bloody butchering of the pages:
—> the draft looks like a crime scene,
—> the junior lawyer feels skewered.
Dear Legal Writer, Before you write “However,” at the start of a sentence, consider this:
▪️ “I love ‘But’ at the beginning of a sentence, and I never put ‘However’ at the beginning—almost never.”
— Justice Antonin Scalia (Garner, 13 The Scribes Journal of Legal Writing (2010), at 60.)
▪️ “‘However,’ is a ‘ponderous’ way to [start a sentence].”
Get this free legal-writing guide!
And wish Chris Schandevel happy birthday today! To celebrate, he’s shared a fabulous gift with you:
It is 74 obest legal-writing tips:
all packed together into one Brief-Writing Ninja Legal Style Guide.
And it’s absolutely free.
I’ve made a lot of mistakes when building my brand.
1️⃣ Remember #Dear1L?
Yeah, that was the hashtag I started and grew to 2,810 followers.
—I started #DearLegalWriter, too. That one I grew to 1,722 followers.
Then LinkedIn said ❌ to hashtags.*
👉 Lesson: Be careful building on rented land.
Dear Legal Writer, Here’s a problem I see in your complaint with the word “would”:
You use the word “would” in front of several of your verbs.
E.g.,
—“Plaintiff would drive 45 minutes longer for the new role.”
—“Plaintiff would contribute $100,000 to the fund.”
In each, there’s ambiguity:
Dear 1L, Lawyers have some wacky ways of writing things.
Learn these today so you don’t get points off in law school:
1️⃣
In the legal world, we spell the word “judgment” without an “e.”
—> Change your Word settings so they autocorrect “judgement” to “judgment” when you type.
Writing on LinkedIn can cause some soul-crushing angst.
Three years ago, I started a pinboard to help me stay motivated.
It hangs on the wall next to where I write.
On it, I’ve collected 10 mottos.
1: Don’t compare yourself to other people. You do YOU.
2: People think about you FAR less than you believe.
Dear Legal Writer: Before you give that partner the draft you’ve been slaving over, make sure you fix these WORDY ways to say “when”:
📍 At this point in time
✅ “Currently” is better
*
📍 At the present time
✅ “Now” is better
How to use “this” & “that” in legal writing
Dear Legal Writer,
Back when I was drafting briefs all the time, I often faced a “this” vs. “that” dilemma:
—It came up most when I needed to describe an argument made by the other side before I could explain that the argument didn’t work.
Dear Legal Writer: Try to focus your “rule statements” around what one party must SHOW, as opposed to what condition must “exist” or “be shown.”
Here are 3 examples:
1️⃣
❌ Instead of:
"For a claim of negligence to be successful, it must be shown that a duty of care existed."
I’m thrilled to report:
A most unexpected eventuality:
My book’s just hit #1 in the “Law” category!
Now, I’m not so naive.
Nothing’s guaranteed,
The rank is just for one day.