Welcome to my LinkedIn archive.
Categories: Dear 1L, Dear 2L, Legal Writing
By Year: 2026, 2025, 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021
Follow me on LinkedIn
Search by word to find what I’ve written on the topic of your choosing!
Dear Legal Writer: The verb “terminate” is NOT a synonym for “fire.”
I learned this rule the hard way. I hope to save you a similar day.
My mistake actually got a BigLaw partner to aim an assault rifle at me!
(Ok, it was an imaginary one, but I was just a first-year associate, and the experience had a big
effect on me.)
Dear Legal Writer: Let’s get “i.e.” and “e.g.” straight, shall we?
I confess, I’m a bit of a Latin geek, but most people aren’t, and i.e. & e.g. routinely cause mixups. In fact, it’s one of the top 5 mistakes Grammar Girl (Mignon Fogarty) says she sees when editing technical documents. (GrammarGirl .com).
Both abbreviations are really common in legal writing, too.
Inspiration from Justice Kagan
Dear 1L, Justice Elena Kagan apparently didn’t rush to “write home about” her 1L fall grades, either. She only received two, according to reports, and they came as a shock:
a B in Crim;
a B- in Torts.
Dear Legal Writer, We’ve all been there: The brief is done, but it’s several pages too long. You’ve got a few hours to cut it before the filing deadline, and you can’t afford to lose substance.
What’s your first move?
Try my P-E-N approach. It kills the culprits behind 3 biggies behind empty words:
Never end a sentence with a preposition.
—Did YOUR middle-school teacher try to sell you that “rule,” too?
And did she also teach you, “It’s wrong grammatically” to use a preposition that way?
Well, she sold you 2 heaps of crap.
10 Ways to Become a Better Legal Writer
Dear Legal Writer, A recent remark by a BigLaw partner stopped me dead in my tracks.
On a post about legal writing (not mine), he commented,
Dear Legal Writer, If you write “is comprised of” or “is comprised by,” you need to read this.
See if you know which of these 3 sentences is correct:
A: The cake comprised 6 ingredients.
B: The cake was comprised by 6 ingredients.
C: The cake was comprised of 6 ingredients.
Dear Legal Writer, Want to get faster at legal writing? Try the Flowers Paradigm.*
Here’s the “how-to”:
For any writing project, cut your process into 4 stages. It helps to think of the stages building a house:
Be careful with the word “draft.”
Dear Legal Writer, I got 2 kinds of contradictory, negative feedback when I was new at different firms. Both turned on the meaning of “draft”:
1️⃣
“Why on earth would you spend time at $500+/hr filling in citations when a paralegal could have done that for $100/hr?
Dear 1L, When you’re new to legal writing, it’s natural to think:
—Courts’ words sound better than your words
—Courts’ full sentences should be quoted at length
—Courts’ reasoning will be more persuasive than your own
Instead, you should know:
“Utilize” is a stilted and stupidiciosis* word
Dear Legal Writer, If you think your reader wants sophisticated words, think
again.
Case in point:
“utilize” (aka, the most stilted, stupid word)
I got a note from “Thus” and “Therefore” overnight.
The note said:
1: “We’re overworked.”
2: “We’re bored of being first in sentences.”
3: “We’d like to sit next to someone other than a comma for once.”
I told them I would see what I could do.
So here’s this to you, my dear legal writer:
Dear 1L, Better legal writers write:
better briefs.
better motions.
better petitions.
better letter briefs.
better client updates.
better law review articles.
better position statements.
better settlement agreements.
better responses to client RFPs.
better thought-leadership articles.
Dear Legal Writer, Don’t be like Demi Moore.
🔷 Remember the court scene in “A Few Good Men”?
Tom Cruise says, “I object,” and the court overrules.
But Demi isn’t satisfied.
She just has to get up & say: “I strenuously object.”
Dear 1L, When you refer to your own case in your Memo, follow this tip.
Stay away from phrases like:
➖ “in this case”
➖ “in the present case”
➖ “in the instant case”
➖ “in the case at bar”
TBS, writing those phrases is not “wrong,” per se.