Please know that the court cases you’re dealing with are NOT “simple and easy.”
In fact, there are no “simple and easy” cases when you’re writing about a brand new area of law.
✏️ You have to teach yourself that law before you can decide what you want to say about it, much less write something persuasive about it.
When I had to write a brief on a legal topic I’d never written about before, I had to spend some time understanding each court case INDIVIDUALLY first, before I could make sense of a group of them.
It helped me to write out a full, formal description of the case in a scratch document.
—I know doing that will seem cumbersome to you, but the process of articulating what a court did in your own words—on paper, in full sentences—has 2 big positives:
1️⃣
It can help you cut through the noise in the case and get you focused on what matters most.
For me, writing up some cases in a separate document often ended up being the only way I could get a real handle on things.
I thought you might try it.
✏️ You never really “know” a case until you go to try to write about it.
2️⃣
It can give you placeholder paragraphs to insert into your Argument section so you’re not starting with a blank page when you go to write.
True, you’ll have to shorten and tweak your descriptions for purposes of the final brief.
✏️ But it’s always easier to cut & condense than it is to add.
***
I’m sending you brain cells and good cheer.
This is a really brutal time of year.
Fondly,
💌 Amanda
#Dear1L
P.S. Sign up for 3 Bullets, a new legal-writing newsletter that comes out once a month & gives you 3 quick bursts of advice: one for brief writers, one for 1L writers, and one for LinkedIn writers.
writinglawtutors.com/newsletter
Dear 1L, Hi. I hope you’re hanging in ok. I’ve had students tell me they had some of their darkest days of law school when trying to get the brief done, and I know you’re in pretty deep.
Previous
Previous
How does one spell it, Big Law? I’ve seen it done every which way.
Next
Next