Dear 1L, When you are doing legal research into case law, there will come a point when you wonder,

“Have I done enough?”

Follow these 7 Steps to make sure you don’t miss a key case.

🔹 1. Find, pull, and skim 3 relevant cases (found from secondary sources, sample briefs, searches under keywords & headnotes, etc.).

🔹 2: Pull and review every case cited within the applicable headnotes of the 3 cases.

🔹 3: If you find new relevant cases, add them to your first 3.

🔹 4: Repeat steps 2 & 3 on the added cases. Soon, you should start to see the same case names reappearing.

—> Keep repeating steps 2 & 3 until you’re no longer turning up any unfamiliar case names.

🔹 5: Shepardize every relevant case you’ve amassed (filtered by applicable headnote(s)).

🔹 6: Repeat the above steps until you are familiar with every relevant case.

🔹 7: To be extra, super-duper safe, Shepardize all your relevant cases in whichever of the two databases (WL/Lexis) you didn’t first use.

—You should already be familiar with all the case results, but occasionally I pick up another stray on Lexis.
___

👉 There will come a point when:

—you see all the same cases cited in the cases and Shepard’s results;
—no more unfamiliar case names pop up within those cases or results; and
—there are no more cases to Shepardize.

When that point comes, you should have peace of mind (or as much of it as any lawyer ever feels).
___

It can be a laborious process, this “exhaustive” research thing—hence, the name, “exhaustive.”

I am sending energy and extra hours in the day to all!

🗳️ What are your reserach tips to save the 1Ls some time?

Anyone have a different “exhaustive” process you use successfully? Please comment and share!

Fondly,
💌 Amanda

#lawstudents
#lawschool
#legalwriting

Previous
Previous

Dear Legal Writer: If I told you to cut down your use of “expletives” in legal writing, you might retort, “I would never use expletives in legal writing.”

Next
Next

Dear 1L, Don’t make this mistake on your Memo.