It’s Time to Blacklist “Prior to.”

Dear Legal Writer:

“Prior to” is NOT a good synonym for “before” in legal writing.

It’s stiff.
It’s stilted.
It’s stuffy.

🔻 “Prior to” will not make you sound smarter than “before.”

🔻 “Prior to” will not impress your reader more than “before.”

And, even if “prior to” did achieve those goals, “sounding” smart and “impressing” your Reader should never be goals.

⭐️ Your goal should be clarity above all else—with simplicity and conciseness next. To attain these goals, you’ll gain nothing from using “prior to.”

🔹 “Before” means the same thing as “prior to.”

🔹 Writing “before” instead of “prior to” does not change meaning.

🔹 Writing “prior to” is less concise, less simple, and less direct.

In fact, I struggle to think of any sentence that would be better with “prior to” instead of “before.”

🗳️ Are there legal practice areas in which “prior to” means something different or more precise than “before”?

Would you all please let me know?

Beyond exceptions your responses may cause,
on my blacklist, “prior to” will go!

🗳️ What think you?

Fondly,
💌 Amanda

#lawstudents
#lawyers
#Dear1L
#legalwriting

NO OK absolutely complete complete advance planning planning afford an opportunity Let a number of some at all times always at such time as when at the present time now basic fundamentals basics by means of by despite the fact that despite due to the fact that because during the time that while each and ever one of us all of us end result result for the reason that for has the ability to can in an effort to to inasmuch as because in close proximity near in the event of if in the near future soon in view of the fact that because most (or very) unique unique cant be qualified perform an analysis analyze until such time as until with the exception of except

As Robert Browning suggested, "Less is more."